

I think the primary argument for removing suckers is for managing how the plant grows. It is taking an unruly growth pattern and turning it into something easily manageable. I think you make good points. I would be surprised to find out that in general your output per row foot/square foot would be equal or less using hard pruning compared to no management. I would also be surprised to find that there is a considerable percentage of indeterminate tomato growers/producers not using hard pruning. It seems to be the go-to way to grow tomatoes. If you were hard pruning you'd probably want to plant more densely to allow for production of other vegetables, or more tomatoes. In your case, hard pruning but not increasing plant density probably would work to lower yield.Gary350 wrote:Last year I had 18 tomato plants that produced about 550 lbs of tomatoes for the summer that = 30 lbs per plant. I never remove suckers anymore. Years ago I tried it both ways, 1/2 my plants had suckers removed the other 1/2 didn't and I could not tell any difference in the harvest. For me removing suckers has not worked but that does not mean it will not work for someone in a different geographical location with different weather, different elevation, different soil. I live in TN it gets a bit too hot in summer for tomatoes the extra leaves from suckers is good it makes extra shade for the tomatoes. Extra leaves make more chlorophyll for the whole plant that should be good too. If you have several plants try removing suckers from some and leaving suckers on others then see which works best for you. It will be interesting to know if someone can prove removing suckers is better.