-
- Newly Registered
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:00 pm
Cactus or succulent?
Is this a cactus or a succulent? How big can it get? Is outside direct sun ok? Any advice is wanted. Thx
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 4:06 pm
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 12:10 pm
- Location: Southern California, Zone 10
Looks like E.Hermentiana/Euphorbia trigona
They do like full sun but would probably flourish in east exposure..
BTW All cactus are succulents but not all succulent are cacti.
Anyway,here is some info I came across....
Because of its cactus-like appearance, Euphorbia trigona is often mistaken for a cactus. However, there are reliable criteria by which Spurge (Euphorbia) can be distinguished from cacti. The spines comes from a horny shields whereas in cacti the spines come always from "areoles" (felted cushions). Paired spines, which are typical for (a large group of) euphorbias, never occur in cacti. Conversely, the typical cactus clump of spines is never seen in euphorbias.
They do like full sun but would probably flourish in east exposure..
BTW All cactus are succulents but not all succulent are cacti.
Anyway,here is some info I came across....
Because of its cactus-like appearance, Euphorbia trigona is often mistaken for a cactus. However, there are reliable criteria by which Spurge (Euphorbia) can be distinguished from cacti. The spines comes from a horny shields whereas in cacti the spines come always from "areoles" (felted cushions). Paired spines, which are typical for (a large group of) euphorbias, never occur in cacti. Conversely, the typical cactus clump of spines is never seen in euphorbias.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 7:11 am
- Location: Costa Blanca
JimHardy wrote:Looks like E.Hermentiana/Euphorbia trigona
They do like full sun but would probably flourish in east exposure..
BTW All cactus are succulents but not all succulent are cacti.
Anyway,here is some info I came across....
Because of its cactus-like appearance, Euphorbia trigona is often mistaken for a cactus. However, there are reliable criteria by which Spurge (Euphorbia) can be distinguished from cacti. The spines comes from a horny shields whereas in cacti the spines come always from "areoles" (felted cushions). Paired spines, which are typical for (a large group of) euphorbias, never occur in cacti. Conversely, the typical cactus clump of spines is never seen in euphorbias.
Not true that all cacti are succulents. Here is Pereskia aculeata growing up my garden wall. The only cactus genus with true, permanent leaves and not succulent. The presence of areoles shows it is a cactus.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 2:41 am
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 7:11 am
- Location: Costa Blanca
With respect, you appear to have taken no notice of what I wrote, but are simply reiterating the incorrect statement I was attempting to put right .enigmaticcurses1977 wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a cactus a type of succulent?
Succulence is defined as the presence of fleshy, water retaining tissue, which has evolved in many families of drought resistant plants.
The genus Pereskia is shown to be of the family Cactaceae by the presence of areoles which are exclusive to this plant family. But it is not succulent, instead having woody stems.
Last edited by Spanishfly on Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
- applestar
- Mod
- Posts: 30556
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 7:21 pm
- Location: Zone 6, NJ (3/M)4/E ~ 10/M(11/B)
This is actually an interesting discussion -- forgive me I am COMPLETELY unknowledgeable about these kinds of plants. I imagine folks who post in this forum have more familiarity with these terms that are being discussed.
"Succulence" vs. "Succulents" are these just semantics or are they specific terms? I took "succulents"/"a succulent" to mean a type of plant -- a noun.
Earlier in Jim Hardy's post describing where/how the spines grow was interesting, too.
But areoles=felted cushions ....haha I'm already lost. What are felted cushions.
"Succulence" vs. "Succulents" are these just semantics or are they specific terms? I took "succulents"/"a succulent" to mean a type of plant -- a noun.
Earlier in Jim Hardy's post describing where/how the spines grow was interesting, too.
But areoles=felted cushions ....haha I'm already lost. What are felted cushions.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 7:11 am
- Location: Costa Blanca
Areoles - the small depressions where hair, spines and flowers (also offsets) appear on members of the family Cactaceae - just look at a cactus and they are obvious.applestar wrote: "Succulence" vs. "Succulents" are these just semantics or are they specific terms? I took "succulents"/"a succulent" to mean a type of plant -- a noun.
A succulent is a plant that possesses succulence - ie has fleshy water storage tissues.
Earlier in Jim Hardy's post describing where/how the spines grow was interesting, too.
But areoles=felted cushions ....haha I'm already lost. What are felted cushions.
- applestar
- Mod
- Posts: 30556
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 7:21 pm
- Location: Zone 6, NJ (3/M)4/E ~ 10/M(11/B)
Thanks! I think I could picture that. So -- (but?) -- this plant which doesn't look like a cactus has areoles?
Spanishfly wrote:
Not true that all cacti are succulents. Here is Pereskia aculeata growing up my garden wall. The only cactus genus with true, permanent leaves and not succulent. The presence of areoles shows it is a cactus.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 7:11 am
- Location: Costa Blanca
Return to “Cactus Forum - Cacti Including all Succulent Plants”