Kellogg Amend "Organic" Compost has Sewage Sludge?

PHONETOOL · Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:33 pm

I was at Home Depot looking for some organic compost The salesperson there said I should use the Kellogg compost. For some reason I always smell before I decide. That stuff smelled like chemicals I told the salesperson I didn't like the smell he insisted the Kellogg sales representative was at the store that passed week and told him the stuff was certified organic

Well good thing I decided to follow my instincts and Googled Kellogg compost before applying it to my organic vegetable garden

This is what I found >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTG05oMG3EY

Here is another article on the subject >> https://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/ ... logg-amend

-

Burz · Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:18 pm

Thanks for the post. This kind of thing frustrates me so much.

I feel bad for the people who want to have a safe garden without knowledge of the filth thats out there. A lot of people have a green thumb and don't know it, and can grow food with little or no knowledge from the web or books. Plant a seed and water. Kind of instinctive really. These are the folks who are affected by this the most, the ones who don't have any troubles in there grows and don't feel the need to join a forum such as this. Many companies mislead consumers into believing there products are safe to make profit when they most certainly are not.(not just garden products)

Things are turning around though I hope,I think. More detectives are out there now unveiling things like this.

rainbowgardener · Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:33 pm

Creepy ... the article didn't even mention all the heavy metals, arsenic, pesticides, etc that can be in sewage sludge. The best compost is the stuff you produce yourself in / from your own garden. Then you have a lot better idea what is in it.

I thought it was worth highlighting this from the article:

A 2009 EPA survey of sludge samples from across the US found nearly universal contamination by 10 flame retardants and 12 pharmaceuticals and exceptionally high levels of endocrine disruptors such as triclosan, an ingredient in antibacterial soap that scientists believe is killing amphibians.

I think we have gone way overboard on this anti-bacterial thing. It's like everyone thinks they should be living in a sterile environment all the time. Life is not open heart surgery!! Not only are all the anti-bacterials bad for the environment, the sterile environment is bad for us. Our immune systems need to learn to recognize intruders when we are young and they need something to practice on generally, otherwise they turn against us and auto-immune diseases and allergies result -- and autoimmune diseases and allergies are proliferating these days.

Here's one article about the sterile environment - allergies connection "boredom of the immune system"

https://www.anthromed.org/Article.aspx?artpk=346

there's lots more out there

PHONETOOL · Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:06 am

I thought I should highlight this from the article

Other people's poo.

I would've been so mad if I had put this in my garden.

rainbowgardener · Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:14 am

Well yeah, but to me the humanure is not at all the worst part of sewage sludge. I'd be much more concerned about all the other stuff that gets in to it - motor oil, heavy metals, pesticides, etc, etc.

Where I lived before we had a composting toilet and we did compost humanure, ours and guests. The biosolids (poo) are composted and break down into fertilizer. The other stuff doesn't break down.

toxcrusadr · Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:07 am

First let me say that I am skeptical about using sewage-derived compost in the garden. So I don't want to sound like I'm defending or advocating it. But I did want to make a few comments.

The City of Milwaukee has been making Milorganite for decades. My dad used it. It is not a new thing to use sewage sludge this way.

"Many companies mislead consumers into believing there products are safe to make profit when they most certainly are not."

This implies that you know sewage derived compost is not safe. Can you cite specific reasons why?

Sewage sludge, by the way, is processed quite a bit more than manure from CAFO's that's (presumably) used in a lot of compost products. The sewage is aerobically digested, then the sludge settled out and sent to a *second*, anaerobic, higher temperature digester before it leaves the plant. THEN composted once again (more or less, depending) with other ingredients.

I bet there's more e coli in the average manure derived compost bag than Kellogg. Just a guess.

"Creepy ... the article didn't even mention all the heavy metals, arsenic, pesticides, etc that can be in sewage sludge. The best compost is the stuff you produce yourself in / from your own garden. Then you have a lot better idea what is in it.

"I thought it was worth highlighting this from the article:

"A 2009 EPA survey of sludge samples from across the US found nearly universal contamination by 10 flame retardants and 12 pharmaceuticals and exceptionally high levels of endocrine disruptors such as triclosan, an ingredient in antibacterial soap that scientists believe is killing amphibians. "

Regarding chemical content, just so everyone knows, there *is* a standard, the Biosolids Rule, governing maximum allowable levels of contaminants. Whether you agree with it or not is a different question, but this *has* been researched and will continue to be as more science is brought to bear.

Finally, the mere presence or detection of a chemical means exactly nothing in terms of toxicity. The phrase 'exceptionally high levels' is judgemental unless it is compared to something. I find that misleading.

And I totally agree about the triclosan and other antibacterials. I avoid them whenever possible when buying soap. Just unnecessary.

rainbowgardener · Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:01 am

Thanks for the thoughtful reply tox. I agree that people shouldn't automatically freak out at the thought of sewage sludge and that if we can find a [safe] way to reclaim all those nutrients we should.

But the existence of an environmental law does not necessarily imply the enforcement of it. The EPA has very limited enforcement capabilities these days.

And the survey I referred to: survey of sludge samples from across the US found nearly universal contamination by 10 flame retardants and 12 pharmaceuticals and exceptionally high levels of endocrine disruptors such as triclosan,

was from the EPA, so presumably they have some knowledge of what is safe and what isn't and what exceptionally high means in reference to the standards that have been set.

I hope we can safely reclaim nutrients from sewage, but I'm not sure we are there yet. It is easier if people do it individually, via composting toilets, to save all those nutrients before they go in to the sewage stream and get mixed in with all the motor oil, industrial wastes, antibacterials, etc.

hshields · Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:57 am

Official US government policy is the disposal of toxic industrial wastes in public sewers. Sewer treatment concentrates the chemicals in the sewage sludge. Pretreatment is no longer strictly enforced for fear of costing industries money and causing loss of jobs.

In 2007, tons of Milwaukee sewage sludge "Milorganite" had to be scraped off 30 public parks and disposed in EPA licensed hazardous waste landfill because of toxic levels of carcinogenic PCBs ( polychloride biphenyl ethers). In 2008 and 2009 Milwaukee had more problems with excessive levels of PCBs in their sludge biosolids.

https://www.thedailygreen.com/environmen ... atest/4284

In 2010, high levels of toxic lead (1100 parts per million) in the Milwaukee sludge biosolids spread on Kenosha, Wisconsin, farm fields greatly exceeded the EPA limit of 300 ppm in Class A EQ sludge biosolids.

https://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/85012452.html

Sewage sludge Milorganite is a dangerous "fertilizer" which should not be used on home gardens or public parks and playgrounds where children and pets are exposed.
Class A sewage sludge biosolids has caused many incidents of illness:

https://www.sludgevictims.com/Class-A-sludge.html

Chemical pollutants and pathogens in sludge are taken up and internalized by vegetables and plants.
https://www.sludgevictims.com/plants/uptake.html

Wastewater treatment does not inactivate infectious human and animal prions which US EPA acknowledges are also present in sewage sludge, including Milorganite and Kelloggs.
https://www.sludgevictims.com/prions/PRI ... DGEBIO.pdf

Helane Shields, Alton, NH https://www.sludgevictims.com
https://www.alzheimers-prions.com/

PHONETOOL · Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:32 pm

hshields wrote:Official US government policy is the disposal of toxic industrial wastes in public sewers. Sewer treatment concentrates the chemicals in the sewage sludge. Pretreatment is no longer strictly enforced for fear of costing industries money and causing loss of jobs.

In 2007, tons of Milwaukee sewage sludge "Milorganite" had to be scraped off 30 public parks and disposed in EPA licensed hazardous waste landfill because of toxic levels of carcinogenic PCBs ( polychloride biphenyl ethers). In 2008 and 2009 Milwaukee had more problems with excessive levels of PCBs in their sludge biosolids.

https://www.thedailygreen.com/environmen ... atest/4284

In 2010, high levels of toxic lead (1100 parts per million) in the Milwaukee sludge biosolids spread on Kenosha, Wisconsin, farm fields greatly exceeded the EPA limit of 300 ppm in Class A EQ sludge biosolids.

https://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/85012452.html

Sewage sludge Milorganite is a dangerous "fertilizer" which should not be used on home gardens or public parks and playgrounds where children and pets are exposed.
Class A sewage sludge biosolids has caused many incidents of illness:

https://www.sludgevictims.com/Class-A-sludge.html

Chemical pollutants and pathogens in sludge are taken up and internalized by vegetables and plants.
https://www.sludgevictims.com/plants/uptake.html

Wastewater treatment does not inactivate infectious human and animal prions which US EPA acknowledges are also present in sewage sludge, including Milorganite and Kelloggs.
https://www.sludgevictims.com/prions/PRI ... DGEBIO.pdf

Helane Shields, Alton, NH https://www.sludgevictims.com
https://www.alzheimers-prions.com/

Very Informative Thank You

-

LA47 · Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:50 pm

Is there a safe compost made that is for sale? Maybe I better stick with aged manure I can get from a farmer till I get my own compost started!

ElizabethB · Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:49 am

Good idea. Does your community offer yard waste pick up? If they do they may also have a composting facility. We have weekly yard waste pick up as part of our municipal service. It is brought to a composting facility. Also tree trimmers and yard services and landscaper and even homeowner bring stuff to the facility. There is a charge to drop off. All of the yard waste is run through HUGE grinders then spread out in rows. They have these really weird looking machines that travel over the rows turning and watering. The resulting compost is given away to parish (county) residents. I have built beds using the stuff. Yes I did have to remove trash - junk folks toss in with their yard waste. But the price is right so the extra effort was justified. On a real big project where running back and forth for multiple 1-2 yard loads is not practible ther is a local soil and gravel company that will pick up and deliver a 14 yard truck full for $75. The math works because the facility is 25 miles away.

If your muncipality does this you have a great free/low cost resource. I have heard of some cities that charge for the compost but the price is usually in $10 per yard range. Still super cheap. Work in some aged manure and you have a garden or flower bed.

Caroline Snyder · Sat Dec 08, 2012 4:17 am

Responding to Toxcrusadr:

The judicious use of seasoned non-CAFO dairy manure has never caused any illnesses or deaths. Sewage sludge, on the other hand, has sickened many hundreds of rural neighbors living and working next to treated fields. Esp. noteworthy is the association of asthma attacks, and a rare form of pneumonia linked to sludge-exposure. Prize-winning dairy herds have been wiped out after animals ingesting forage grown on sludge, sickened and died. Sludge has polluted wells, and permanently poisoned healthy soil
The Biosolids Rule, which Toxcrusader touts, has been discredited by the prestigious National Academy of Sciences, which warned that the current biosolids (sludge) regulations are out-dated and based on faulty risk assessment models.
Sewage sludge generated in industrialized urban centers contains thousands of man-made chemicals, some of which are highly toxic and persistent, the vast majority of which are not regulated. Sludge or sludge products do not belong on the land where we grow our food. The Sierra Club recently issued a compost policy, promoting composts made with clean feed stocks, and opposing any kind of compost that contains toxic materials, such as sewage sludge.

https://sierraclub.org/policy/conservation/compost.pdf

For information how the EPA, state agencies, and the USDA are actually working with industry to PROMOTE a practice that they know is harmful, see
IJOEH_1104_snyder.pdf posted on www.sludgefacts.org

toxcrusadr · Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:33 am

Some very good points have been made. I do not choose to 'defend' sludge compost, or the Clean Water Act.

Rainbow: Yes, the EPA study identified chemicals. I am quite sure the study itself and whatever press release they did when it was released, specifically pointed out that DETECTION means absolutely bupkis with respect to risk. It was not a risk assessment study, only the results of analytical testing of a bunch of sludge samples. Nothing more. It's Step 1 of a multi step process to determining risk. To say that it means sludge is full of toxins is making it sound like more than it is.

Hshields: It's hyperbole to say that official government policy is to dispose of toxic industrial waste in the sewers. Unless the discharge limits are zero, there has to be a minimum number. In practice, zero, if it could be achieved, could not be measured or confirmed by any method on Earth. So there has to be a nonzero limit for everything. If you disagree with the numbers, that's a different topic.

I do not 'tout' the Biosolids Rule. I only brought it up to point out that there is a certain amount of regulation, however flawed it may be, in case there are readers who thought otherwise.

Thousands of chemicals are on the market and most have not been environmentally tested. The fact that they end up in the environment means they should be.

We should be asking ourselves whether we need to use all this stuff in the first place. Is antibiotic liquid hand soap really necessary?

Aside from the lead and PCBs that were reported (deffly a problem!), a lot of this stuff is in household and personal care products. If we're scared of triclosan in the compost, why are we washing our hands with it? Matter of fact, it is probably not a risk in compost for that very reason, but it does make you think.

toxcrusadr · Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:55 am

Later as I was thinking about this, I realized that the solution to a lot of our problems would be to require ingredient labelling of commercial compost. Then, at least, the consumer could decide for him/herself whether they wanted to use the product. The market would decide what was acceptable.

There are no federal labeling requirements for compost, and maybe that's something we could all agree on.

Flowerhead · Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:04 pm

edited to remove wrong info ....

I use it but only on my lawn. I use it because it's pretty inexpensive. I wouldn't use it on any crops

I apply water after fertilizing and that area will smell like someone's butt for about 24-36 hrs

Not the greatest stuff but it has some uses

toxcrusadr · Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:45 am

You're close but off on a few details. The process is Activated Sludge, in which wastewater (sewage) is biologically treated by bubbling a lot of air through it to encourage microbial growth. The microbes feed on the dissolved organics, removing N, P and organic matter (which becomes CO2, water and bacterial mass). This all occurs at ambient temps. The mixture is then allowed to settle, and what settles out is the sludge. The sludge can be further digested aerobically or anaerobically (the later at higher temps about 150F, IIRC), or composted by mixing with low-nitrogen organics like sawdust.

1000 degrees would not only boil it dry instantly, but it would catch on fire and burn up to ash.

Sludge is sometimes incinerated for disposal but what finds its way into compost has probably not been subjected to anything over about 150F.

Here's a thing on sewage treatment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewage_treatment

Flowerhead · Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:21 am

^^^Thanks for the correction!!

I looked up activated sewer sludge again....and you are right. I'm not sure where I got the 1,000 degrees part. I thought biosolids were like a bio-char that's been heated up really high...I must have my facts mixed up with something else.....I must of been thinking activated carbon

Anyway.....I like to use the stuff because it's cheap and I have several acres of lawn & I want to feed at least some of it. At $12 for 40lbs, it's ok by me

rot · Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:54 pm

..
The problem with sewer sludge isn't the humanure component but everything else that ends up in the sewers.

That said, what else would you do with all that um, stuff? Yeah. Stufff. What else would do with all that stuff?
..

toxcrusadr · Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:36 am

That, indeed, is the inescapable question. Taking everything into consideration, my approach would be:

1) Increase efforts to reduce chemical use by everyone (consumers as well as industry) and discourage disposal of stuff in the sewer that shouldn't go there.
2) Use sludge in safer ways and avoid potentially unsafe ways like spraying liquid sludge near people and using it on food crops.
3) Continue researching toxicity issues, including 'traditional' toxins and emerging contaminants.
4) Improve labeling requirements for commercial compost products so people know what they're buying.

Nothing earth-shattering here, but hopefully some common sense.

rainbowgardener · Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:01 am

AND composting toilets for everyone, to save the nutrients before they get mixed in with all the bad stuff.

You can buy or make simple bucket system composting toilets that look nice and are inoffensive for not too much $$. And saves flushing all that pure drinkable water!

I think I talked myself into bringing the issue up at home again!

toxcrusadr · Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:47 am

I built a composting outhouse at our rural property last year. Not sure it would fly at our suburban home, but when it's dark out, liquid fertilizer is discreetly applied directly to the ground with no problems at all.

rot · Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:54 pm

..
Well I like the limerick potential - Nantucket, bucket and so on.

As long as it's as easy as flushing a toilet to get rid of anything from shaving cream to toilet bowl cleaner to prescription drugs to drain cleaner, I can't trust any of these municipal sludge products. I just can't. I'm not even going to speculate on the ever changing industrial components.

You know, if I wanted to grow a super bug of some sort, I would try to get something to survive our antibiotics and cleaners and industrial toxins that you might find in a sewer. Anything that can grow in that has got to be dangerous.

to sense
..

toxcrusadr · Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:12 am

The bad guys are probably already working on that.

cynthia_h · Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:33 am

rot wrote:..

You know, if I wanted to grow a super bug of some sort, I would try to get something to survive our antibiotics and cleaners and industrial toxins that you might find in a sewer. Anything that can grow in that has got to be dangerous.

to sense
..

I think several "super bugs" are already here: Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and a virulent form of tuberculosis, nearly resistant to everything that's been tried against it. Malaria, which had been very responsive to the artemisinin pharmaceuticals maybe 12 or so years ago, now scoffs at them because it has developed resistance to them so quickly.

A large % of antibiotics in the U.S. is used in CAFOs (concentrated animal-feeding operations, commonly called feedlots), where cattle or swine are "finished" for market. They're packed in so tightly that disease will run rampant without the drugs. This article details the connection between MRSA and feedlot antibiotic use.

A lovely article on the connection btw antibiotic-resistant UTIs and poultry raised on "prophylactic" (preventive) doses of antibiotics, discovered only this year by researchers in several countries around the world.

Here's a scientific study from the CDC on the rise of antibiotic-resistant strains of E. coli cases in the past two decades or so.

Antibiotic-resistant bugs are winning; people--and animals--are losing. The more we use antibiotics indiscriminately, the fewer weapons we will have left when we *really need help.*

This is already showing up in veterinary medicine, as well as in the human diseases I've listed above.

My new rescue dog leaked blood from his...urethra...almost three weeks ago, Monday, December 3. Took him to the vet as soon as I possibly could! The med prescribed, Clavamox, is 1) very expensive and 2) usually a 10-day course. Not this time. This time, we had to administer it to this unwilling 100-pound doggie for fourteen (yes, 14) days to make sure the infectious agent was good and killed.

I got some intense upper-body resistance exercise and some colorful bruises from his teeth and the backlash of his head onto my forearms. When a Bernese Mtn. Dog decides NO, that's a real NO, and it takes sheer strength, both of mind and body, to get the meds into the dog--yes, even when the meds are coated in cream cheese. The first photo in the linked article is of an adult male. Now imagine him with his very large paws planted on the floor in reverse gear, teeth clenched shut, snapping his head back and forth...yep. That was us for two whole weeks, twice a day. But the bugs seem to be gone. This time....

With all of this depressing news, how can an individual help?

Use regular soaps and cleaners, not "anti-bacterial" soaps and cleaners (you may need to make your own cleaners). The function of soap is to get the germs on your skin to slide off your skin and down the drain, where the local waste-treatment plant can kill them. Use warm to hot water, depending on what you personally can tolerate, to build up the lather and then send it *and the germs* down the drain.

Be thankful that you have access to clean water; many in our world do not. But regular old soap, detergent, bleach in the laundry, etc., do a fine job.

Hospitals in the 1930s had a very low rate of infection because they were absolutely scrupulous about infection control: hand-washing, bleach, hot water, etc. Antibiotics hadn't been discovered yet. Yes, folks: we've run through these miracle drugs in 60 to 70 years.

Back to the '30s....

Cynthia H.
Sunset Zone 17, USDA Zone 9

ElizabethB · Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:37 pm

You guys and gals have presented lots of thoughtful information. You have certainly gotten me thinking. Chemicals are not allowed in our sewer system but many irresponsible people do dump illegal chemicals into the system.. Like the Yahoo down the street that changes his oil and dumps it in the sewer drain. What about common household chemicals? What happens to all of the detergents (laundry detergent, fabric softener, dish soap, dishwasher soap, bath soap, shampoo, conditioner, and an endless list of other cleaning products) that we use that goes into a municple sewer system? How is that treated? I am not trying to be argumentative. I seriously want to know how all of that stuff is delt with. I know nothing about waste treatment.

The point about anti-bacterial every thing is well taken. I am kind of a germ a phobe. Everything is anti-bacterial and I use lots of vinegar and bleach when cleaning.

What am I doing to our waste system?

Not to mention the cost of all of these products. HMMM. should we look into alternatives?

WOW - you all really have me on a roll. For starters I know I can make my own bath soap. What are safe alternatives to all of the other chemicals we use in our homes?

I would never classify myself as a "tree hugger" but I do care about my environment. I will probably always use some chemicals in moderation but it would be nice to find alternatives. I took a long hard look in my laundry room, cabinet under the sink and bathrooms and could not believe how many cleaning products I have.

Should we start a thread on alternatives?

May be a good topic for discussion.

Merry Christmas one and all.

rot · Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:41 pm

..
I've seen your eyes and I can see deathÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s disguise
hanging on me.
Hanging on me.

I hear you loud and clear Cynthia_h.

The dogs: been there and you're braver than I am. So hard.

The cleaners: it's friction really. Soap provides two things. The most cited is the surfactant property where it helps allow the water in to smaller egresses and lets the friction of water wash away things. The other is the pH effect. Soaps tend to be alkaline opposite the acid environment a lot of bad microbes like. Detergents are chemical and are another matter that I can't speak to and I'd look to Tox to explain and catalysts and stuff. Otherwise scrub off with water.

MRSA: As I understand things. MRSA came out of the hospital environment where most of our super bugs are coming from right now. Hospitals are another little laboratory for cooking up resistant beings since Hospitals are in direct competition with certain things. it's kind of logical in that hospitals are environments made as septic as possible to combat something that is fighting for survival. Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger? The fun loving boys in the sewer will wait I'm sure.

Back to the thirties economically and environmentally. Really.

Water. I'm using water more than anything else to combat the bad guys. I just make sure I rinse/wash with water thoroughly. Out here in Calley Forn Ya (as our former governor would say) water is becoming expensive little by little. Mark Twain in California: Ã¢â‚¬ËœWhiskey is for drinking and water is for fighting overÃ¢â‚¬â„¢. Don't take water lightly.

it's not going to get any easier but I'm placing my bets on the hygiene theory. I'm going to worry less about stepping in something the dogs left in the backyard than the crud [the FCC won't let me say what I really think] in the parking lot I walk across to get to the big box store.

too jaded sense
..

rainbowgardener · Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:39 pm

"Chemicals are not allowed in our sewer system"

Sorry, Elizabeth, but in what world? Read back through the beginning of this thread. All manner of chemicals are dumped in the sewage system, not only all the stuff that residentially we put in, the antibacterials, bleach, cleansers, drain cleaners, prescription drugs disposed of by flushing, etc, etc, but industrial wastes.

wiki: Sewage is generated by residential,institutional, and commercial and industrial establishments. It includes household waste liquid from toilets, baths, showers, kitchens, sinks and so forth that is disposed of via sewers. In many areas, sewage also includes liquid waste from industry and commerce.

If you google "industrial waste water in sewage system" part of what will come up is guides that various localities put out about what industries need permits to discharge wastes into the sewage, what's allowed, etc.

Here's one e.g. from Los Angeles:

https://san.lacity.org/business/pdf/iwmguide.pdf

If you look, on page 4 begins a list of allowable quantities of different pollutants that industrial permit holders can put in the sewer system. It includes allowances for arsenic, mercury, cyanide, petroleum etc etc.

And of course, because there is an allowed limit to all these pollutants doesn't mean that the industries that are hooked up to the sewage system don't exceed those limits, accidentally or accidentally-on-purpose. All our environmental agencies at the local state and federal level are woefully underfunded and limited in their ability to inspect and monitor.

Basically disposing of industrial waste through the sewage system is still policy.

rainbowgardener · Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:55 pm

And yes, I agree with cynthia, that we are headed back to the 19th century in terms of having effective antibiotics to treat infectious diseases AND agriculturally in terms of having effective herbicides and pesticides. Not only disease organisms are developing resistance to our chemicals, but also weeds, insects, etc.

This from Purdue University:

https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/gwc/gwc-1.pdf

on page 4 has a table of known RoundUp resistant weeds. And it says:

Although the total number of glyphosate-resistant weed species is low, the
number of species is increasing at an alarming rate (see Figure 2).

If you look it up, the same is true for EVERY other herbicide and pesticide. In the course of a century, through severe over use and abuse, we are succeeding in wiping out the usefulness of all these tools. It would have been possible by minimizing the use of these chemicals and only using them in spot applications (limited in time and area) where absolutely necessary, not only to limit their environmental harm, but to preserve their usefulness where needed.

AND it was all unnecessary and environmentally harmful and harmful to our health. Note where rot mentions the "hygiene hypothesis." That is the idea that we need exposure to antigens (microbes, parasites, and other outside intruders) in early childhood to train our immune systems and throughout life to keep them challenged. Without that, our immune systems attack us causing auto-immune diseases and allergies. As we put ourselves in more sterile situations with constant use of anti-bacterials, auto-immune diseases and allergies have been rising exponentially.

toxcrusadr · Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:09 am

>>Detergents are chemical and are another matter that I can't speak to and I'd look to Tox to explain and catalysts and stuff. Otherwise scrub off with water.

Detergents are really very similar to soaps but they have varying biodegradability because they are not made from natural fats. Some of them are suspected to be endocrine disruptors at or near the concentrations exiting sewage plants. And therein lies the problem.

My approach:

3) Use less cleaning products! Tide box says to use a full cup? Use 2/3, or half. See if that works just as well. You know, they are in business to selll MORE. Use half as much shampoo. Hair still clean? Try less diswasher detergent. Observe and adjust.

2) Use alternatives. Do you really need Super Duper Multi Surface Anti-Bacterial Glass Chrome Stainless Tub Toilet and Superfund Site Spray, or will 1/4 cup of ammonia in a quart of water be sufficient to clean car windows and stove? There are lots of choices.

3) Water is a great solvent and will remove 90% of dirt. Clean surfaces or objects first with water, THEN use cleaning products sparingly to get the last of the residue if needed. Don't just dowse everything with detergents before starting.

estorms · Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:43 am

I lived in Milwaukee when the sewer sluge first came out. It was supposed to be sterilized. My neighbor moved into a new house and put it on her lawn. The whole yard came up in tomatoes. I know people don't digest tomato seeds. I also know that sluge was not sterilized. It never pays to be first when dealing with new farming methods. that stuff will really burn your plants too. I side dressed with it in the late seventies and killed my whole garden.

rot · Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:27 am

..
I still haven't seen a clear explanation of the difference between soap and detergent. Is it just a word origin thing? Latin or Greek vs Anglo Saxon?

My sense is that soap just effects a surfactant facilitating the mechanical process process of washing while a detergent effects a chemical action of some sort.

Most soaps are alkaline and that seems to be anti-bacterial enough for me. In light of recent ideas that our bodies are really complex ecosystems of microbial life interacting with our own cells, I don't think I want to utterly destroy those ecosystems.

I've been halving the dose on detergents as a general rule for a long time now. I really like to make sure I get all the soap out my clothes after washing them.

to sense
..

rainbowgardener · Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:40 pm

Soap is natural/organic; basically created from the reaction of an alkaline like lye and the acid in oils or fats. Detergent is synthetic, petroleum based.

toxcrusadr · Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:57 am

I agree with rainbow's definition. I can add a bit more detail below if you're interested. There is really no fundamental difference in the action of soaps and detergents.

Fats are long carbon chains with a carboxylic acid functional group on one end (COOH). In the naturally occurring acid form they are called fatty acids. The bottle of vegetable oil in your kitchen is just that. When mixed with lye, a base, I.e. saponification, you get a sodium salt of the fatty acid. That's soap. It's only alkaline if there is a bit more lye in it than fat so all the lye is not used up and some ends up in the final product.

The carbon chain end of the molecule dissolves oil and grease, and the salt end dissolves in water, which is how soap does its thing dissolving oils.

Synthetic detergents work exactly the same way, but chemists are able to combine all kinds of different building blocks for the two ends of the molecule to create products that you can't make from saponifying vegetable or animal fats. The carbon end can be a benzene ring, or the fatty acid end can be an ester instead of an acid (nonylphenol ethoxylate is a popular one that shows up in many products), or a sulfate instead of a carboxylate (sodium lauryl sulfate is in everything!). Branched chains can be used. Or you can attach fatty acids to a central nitrogen atom instead of carboxylic acid, to make an ammonium surfactant.

Some of these are not as biodegradable as natural soaps because they are not naturally occurring and microbes do not have efficient enzyme systems to chew them up. That's the reason why some of them come through the sewage plants. If they also happen to have toxic effects on aquatic life, trouble ensues.

rot · Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:36 pm

..
Well it would seam that soap is Old English or Old High German in origin while detergent is Latin. Saponification origins seem a little murky.

"Synthetic detergents work exactly the same way" That begs the question of why a different word. Latin sells while Old English or Anglo Saxon has street cred like Defecation v EDITED - PLEASE REPORT THIS POST.

I notice it seemed necessary while talking about detergents that the word 'synthetic' needed to be included. Synthetic coupled with the Latin origins connotes a certain falsehood in my mind. I can't help but feel there's some kind of unsavory agenda behind detergents. Throw in the problem with breaking detergents down in nature and the word detergent strikes me as undesirable. Something to be avoided.

Not that I'm a Luddite or something but, I've long mistrusted the diction of Latin v Anglo Saxon. Some of us eat food while others have cuisine and so on.

"The carbon end can be a benzene ring" Benzene? That's what's in my lighter? Right?

Thanks. I guess I'll go and soap up some dishes with detergent and wipe them off with water.

to sense
..

rot · Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:43 am

..
"Defecation v EDITED."

That's a sore point with me but why waste my key strokes.

to sense
..

toxcrusadr · Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:25 am

I don't know much about the history of synthetic surfactants, but I suspect, as with so many other things the chemical industry invented in the last 100 years, that there were technical reasons as well as market forces.

On the technical side, natural soaps do not perform as well in hard water (soap scum!) and some of the synthetics are better at that. There are many specialty applications like gasoline additives to keep your engine clean, that are made possible with Ã¢â‚¬ËœdesignerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ molecules. Some synthetics make less foam, making the dishwasher and washing machine possible.

I doubt there was some hidden agenda other than making new products to do more things in order to make lots of money. But, as with pesticides and a host of other products, mankind had the ability to invent and produce them long before we had an understanding of subtle environmental effects.

Your lighter is likely full of butane, which is rather harmless. Benzene, a carcinogen, is one of the major toxic components of gasoline, so you're driving around with a tank of it every time you turn the key. don't inhale when you fill up. However, the benzene ring occurs as a building block in a huge number of molecules, including some of the amino acids in proteins. Molecules are harmful or not, but their basic building blocks do not determine which.

rot · Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:30 pm

..
Thanks for the explanations.

The chemical industry gave us what we wanted, more effective cleaners at a cheaper price. It seems like we moderns don't have a grasp of what the ancients try to tell us in their stories like Prometheus, Icarus and Pandora's Box that new ideas and new technologies are double edged swords. Yes great things come with all these new fangled things but also hidden costs.

I'd like to recycle some of my gray water out of the washer in my compost bins so I'm trying out some new detergents and even a couple of 'green' fabric softeners. Those synthetic scents they add though always give me pause and I really do wonder what some mean by 'organic'. That word seems to get chucked about with very little definition attached to it. That and every time I hear the work 'organic' I imagine my old high school chemistry teacher glaring down at me.

to scents
..

rainbowgardener · Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:21 pm

rot wrote:..
Thanks for the explanations.

The chemical industry gave us what we wanted, more effective cleaners at a cheaper price. It seems like we moderns don't have a grasp of what the ancients try to tell us in their stories like Prometheus, Icarus and Pandora's Box that new ideas and new technologies are double edged swords. Yes great things come with all these new fangled things but also hidden costs.

I'd like to recycle some of my gray water out of the washer in my compost bins so I'm trying out some new detergents and even a couple of 'green' fabric softeners. Those synthetic scents they add though always give me pause and I really do wonder what some mean by 'organic'. That word seems to get chucked about with very little definition attached to it. That and every time I hear the work 'organic' I imagine my old high school chemistry teacher glaring down at me.

to scents
..

Yes indeed! Love the mythology analogies!

I've been thinking about gray water too, though I haven't done anything about it. Wouldn't it be easier to recycle water from your kitchen sink? Would be less likely to have any chemicals in it.

What I have wondered about is storage. I guess that's why you said putting the water in the compost pile. But even a compost pile could get too wet. It seems like gray water comes in bunches, none and then a lot. That's another reason why I was thinking about the kitchen sink, it gets used every day but in smaller quantities, not a zillion gallons at once.

If you were saving gray water, wouldn't you need a cistern for storage and a pump to get it back out of the cistern? All of a sudden you are talking about big bucks. What I would be hoping for would be some kind of more passive system where you could just let it drain out into a well drained area of the garden or into a rain garden area.

I was thinking your kitchen sink could have a valve/diverter kind of thing so if there had been too much rain lately you could just let the water go into the sewage system as usual, but in drought you could send it to the garden.

We should make a separate thread for this, I'm really interested!!

rot · Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:36 pm

..
I'm only passively interested in gray water at the moment. Currently I'm renting a small place with a small washer that empties into a utility sink. I'm not interested in any kind of elaborate plumbing installation in my current situation. I just figured that with some long hose and a hose clamp that I could start running the water out of the washer into a barrel outside starting in spring. Maybe 10 ft of hose will get it out the door and to a low barrel and the ground outside is lower than the threshold of the door. As long as I'm not narrowing down the hose, I figure I won't put too much extra work on the pump inside the washer. Come winter, when the rains come anyway, I could just roll up the hose for the season.

The last place I was at, I had an unused sump pump for some reason and I figured I could drain the large washer there into a trash barrel and with the sump pump, pump the water out somewhere. I couldn't seem to figure out a way of running a line outside without someone getting upset and for a long time I had this barrel with a sump pump in it sitting next to the washer. All pumped up and no where to go.

Since most washers just drain from a hose hooked up to a drain somewhere, it seems simplest to divert that in some fashion instead of hiring a plumber or something installing valves and extra drain pipe and so on.

I would think the permaculture folks would have some gray water ideas starting with collecting rain water. I haven't rooted around too much myself on the subject. I've heard of people draining their gray water into a pond maybe letting it drain through a sand filter first and things like that. The LA Times had a feature article once on some incredibly expensive house on a hillside with a living roof and bamboo floors and they were collecting their rain water into an underground cistern and letting it drain down the hillside through a drip irrigation system.

The other thing you have to look out for with gray water is there are a lot of restrictions at the state and municipal level. They don't want that stuff pooling up on the surface. Some places are starting to ease up on those restrictions but you'd better do your homework.

You might want to look into collecting rainwater off the roof and see what kind of hoops and hurdles you need to jump through to get that to work and then pursue gray water.

Do your homework and good luck.

to sense
..

rainbowgardener · Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:25 pm

I have two 75 gallon rain barrels collecting roof water. I just hate how much water is wasted. And in the drought years we've been having lately (global warming), the rain barrels may sit empty for a month or more. Kitchen sink is always putting water down the drain, if I could "harvest" that, there would always be a supply.

A diverter seems like actually fairly simple plumbing. Since my house is on top of a hill, the kitchen sink is well above grade to everything else. Since no bad chemicals go down my kitchen sink, I might just not worry about codes and let them try to catch me.

The biggest question would be how to get the water from the diverter outside the house and to somewhere where it would be useful. How do I find an "eco-plumber" who might have an interest in a project like this?