So I got tired of reading about all the things I can't see without a microscope.
Eventually I will be able to attach a camera, though it may be a while.
Still, I am excited!
Anyone else looking at soil this close?
- Ozark Lady
- Greener Thumb
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:28 pm
- Location: NW Arkansas, USA zone 7A elevation 1561 feet
- gixxerific
- Super Green Thumb
- Posts: 5889
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 5:42 pm
- Location: Wentzville, MO (Just West oF St. Louis) Zone 5B
Very cool, I want to see pictures when that time comes.
Like my worm thread I just love all the life I see now. You really wouldn;t believe how many worms I have, but every time in the garden I see something new wriggling around, and to able to check out all the microscopic residents would be way cool for me, and obviously you.
So scope on and I'm sure it will bring a new meaning to this garden thing.
Dono
Like my worm thread I just love all the life I see now. You really wouldn;t believe how many worms I have, but every time in the garden I see something new wriggling around, and to able to check out all the microscopic residents would be way cool for me, and obviously you.
So scope on and I'm sure it will bring a new meaning to this garden thing.
Dono
-
- Mod
- Posts: 7491
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:17 pm
- Location: Colchester, CT
There is something called a [url=https://www.optical-systems.com/bms-tcam-13mp-mikrokular-p-1559.html?language=gb]microcular system[/url] that I have used before that can be a really cool tool for scopes and PCs (or laptops)...
Nice purchase, toil. Can I come play sometime? I'm no Elaine Ingham, but can teach you a little bit I suspect, and with all the hours I have logged, have a pretty good eye... can't afford one right now, but soon...
HG
Nice purchase, toil. Can I come play sometime? I'm no Elaine Ingham, but can teach you a little bit I suspect, and with all the hours I have logged, have a pretty good eye... can't afford one right now, but soon...
HG
- Ozark Lady
- Greener Thumb
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:28 pm
- Location: NW Arkansas, USA zone 7A elevation 1561 feet
Don't anyone laugh!
Once I got a kids microscope, because I was homeschooling my kids, it was a cheapy! But, we made up slides, and had a blast looking through it. It was a sad day when it quit working, due to being dropped and breaking some mirrors in it. I'm sure it was no comparison to the real thing! But, if you ever find a kids microscope at a yard sale, get it, it will still show you more than your naked eye can see. Just be sure the mirrors aren't broken.
Once I got a kids microscope, because I was homeschooling my kids, it was a cheapy! But, we made up slides, and had a blast looking through it. It was a sad day when it quit working, due to being dropped and breaking some mirrors in it. I'm sure it was no comparison to the real thing! But, if you ever find a kids microscope at a yard sale, get it, it will still show you more than your naked eye can see. Just be sure the mirrors aren't broken.
- !potatoes!
- Greener Thumb
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: wnc - zones 6/7 line
-
- Mod
- Posts: 7491
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:17 pm
- Location: Colchester, CT
-
- Mod
- Posts: 7491
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:17 pm
- Location: Colchester, CT
Yeah, eye strain can be a bear, especially if you are spending hours at it. That's why the stereo eypieces are pretty much standard in labs and why I want to go there instead of monocular (and you are right; I have NO idea what trinocular means )
Still for the ampount of time I would expect to be using one now, I don't see why I might not go the cheap and get a monocular one. Don't expect to be running dozens of field counts on dozens of samples anytime soon, and I could step up later...
THEN I could afford one... $150 vs. $1500. I have seen the obsessive nature of a good scope; it's nice, then it's OK, but boy, if I spent another ten thousand, and then the next step is a $75000 dollar scope, but wouldn't it be great if we could really see the bacteria? Electron, anyone? Mortgage the house...
There's no end to it. But I'm not sure I will be happy on a monocular unit after using a fancy stereo one, so I've been waiting and watching...
HG
Still for the ampount of time I would expect to be using one now, I don't see why I might not go the cheap and get a monocular one. Don't expect to be running dozens of field counts on dozens of samples anytime soon, and I could step up later...
THEN I could afford one... $150 vs. $1500. I have seen the obsessive nature of a good scope; it's nice, then it's OK, but boy, if I spent another ten thousand, and then the next step is a $75000 dollar scope, but wouldn't it be great if we could really see the bacteria? Electron, anyone? Mortgage the house...
There's no end to it. But I'm not sure I will be happy on a monocular unit after using a fancy stereo one, so I've been waiting and watching...
HG
-
- Mod
- Posts: 7491
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:17 pm
- Location: Colchester, CT
Yeah having used those systems (not top of the line, and I'm sure they have gotten better) resolution is an issue, as is pixalation. I know they have gotten more definition, but it is still hard to get a defined field from the screen; easier with the eyball. I used to adjust it to my eye, then adjust from there to the microcular...
I do see some scopes that have done away with the eyepieces all together...
HG
I do see some scopes that have done away with the eyepieces all together...
HG
- Sage Hermit
- Green Thumb
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:20 pm
- Location: Finlaysen, MN Coniferous Forest
Toil, in case you haven't already, make sure to get some microscopy stains. Most of the interesting stuff is nearly transparent. You'll see way more and depending on the type of stain, you can make some educated guesses as to what species you are looking at. Methylene blue is probably the easiest to use and very cheap, while a Gram stain kit will be more diagnostic. I also found a cool paper on staining for mycorrhizal fungus: [url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC90956/[/url]
While you're at it, get some Protoslo ([url]https://www.carolina.com/product/885141.do[/url]) if you want to see protozoa. Most want to avoid the bright light of your microscope and move almost too fast to see (except amoeba, of course).
While you're at it, get some Protoslo ([url]https://www.carolina.com/product/885141.do[/url]) if you want to see protozoa. Most want to avoid the bright light of your microscope and move almost too fast to see (except amoeba, of course).
-
- Mod
- Posts: 7491
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:17 pm
- Location: Colchester, CT
Yeah I learned flagellates and cilliates on the first day and had the difference between actinobacters and fungal hyphae on day two, but it took me about a month and a half to spot my first amoeba, despite the prevalence. Without a stain they are incredibly hard to spot...
Sounds like you have some experience Dan...
HG
Sounds like you have some experience Dan...
HG
- Ozark Lady
- Greener Thumb
- Posts: 1862
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:28 pm
- Location: NW Arkansas, USA zone 7A elevation 1561 feet
I am looking for a microscope. In another forum, I am learning to do such mundane and yucky things as fecal samples for my animals!
They posted links to slides of the various parasites in various stages, and times to look for them.
So, if we use the microscope also for garden applications, what exactly are we looking for? Besides just having fun with it?
They posted links to slides of the various parasites in various stages, and times to look for them.
So, if we use the microscope also for garden applications, what exactly are we looking for? Besides just having fun with it?
It's just another way to get information about your soil. More is always better!
What pushed me over the edge was a trip to the dermatologist. He took a scraping and told me he was going to look at it under the scope.
"cool! Can I look as well?"
"no."
there are so many things I want to see besides soil. Like the mucelage from my sundews, bokashi, EM, you name
it!
What pushed me over the edge was a trip to the dermatologist. He took a scraping and told me he was going to look at it under the scope.
"cool! Can I look as well?"
"no."
there are so many things I want to see besides soil. Like the mucelage from my sundews, bokashi, EM, you name
it!
Self taught is what I did concerning the scope. Sending out for a bioassay is really expensive. The reason I bought my scope off microbe organics A: good deal(I thought) B: It came with the DVD"S on teaching myself as well the calculations of figuring out the populations. Now my lawn customers are more inclined to have the test done now that I charge them say 1/3 of the cost as it would if I sent to SFW inc. Sure my counts and print outs aren't as precise and flashy as theirs but it does give me a rough idea.
-
- Mod
- Posts: 7491
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:17 pm
- Location: Colchester, CT
Right on, CL; a field count on your scope isn't a bioassay with SFW, but it can get you in the ballpark if not on base. I still would like to know what I have for nematode species, and I'll be darned if I can suss out active to inactive ratios on the SFI assay, but I do know good soil when I am looking at it in the scope. Too many cilliates? Probably compacted because it's certainly low on O2. Lots of bacteria and no protozoa? SOMETHING polluted it because a mast food source with no predators is an ecosystem gone wrong... no fungal mass? Houston, we have a problem...
Just more good information...
HG
Just more good information...
HG