Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:45 pm
Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:40 pm
Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:48 pm
Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:07 am
Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:50 pm
Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:45 pm
Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:10 pm
Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:40 pm
Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:23 am
Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:17 pm
Sun Apr 05, 2009 2:03 pm
Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:58 pm
Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:38 pm
Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:57 am
Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:53 pm
Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:55 pm
Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:44 pm
Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:57 pm
Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:25 pm
Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:40 pm
Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:42 pm
Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:15 am
Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:31 pm
Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:28 pm
Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:20 am
Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:35 pm
Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:34 am
Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:50 am
Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:28 pm
The Helpful Gardener wrote:I find the whole upside down thing a little faddish and from watching the plants I see grown this way I'm not sure that growing greens down and roots up is catching on with the plants, either. They all seem to be fighting gravity, and I have seen more than a few examples where they shoot out the top anyway...
Elevenplants, sounds like you are running a side by side trial with varieties both in ground and upside down. Might it be possible to measure fruit output on a plant by plant basis, measuring like cultivars from the same batch of seeds, one against the other? It might be a little extra bookeeping but you would be doing science and your fellow gardeners a service and confirming a long held belief of mine that this method is counterproductive. Waddaya say?
HG
Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:51 pm
Fri May 01, 2009 5:19 pm
Fri May 01, 2009 5:23 pm
Fri May 01, 2009 5:46 pm
Fri May 01, 2009 6:21 pm
Sat May 02, 2009 12:08 pm
Sun May 03, 2009 12:14 am
Sun May 03, 2009 1:25 pm
Mon May 04, 2009 1:12 am
Mon May 04, 2009 7:05 pm
Wed May 06, 2009 12:42 pm