if this "report" is based on Dr Don Huber's work, I suggest you do an internet search on his name.
you will find a lot of "headlines" citing world famous, world reknown, leading expert, etc.
question: who, other than the good doctor, says he is? just because he is a retired professor does not mean he's not a bit quirky.
and then there's this problem,,,, there's likely tens of thousands of academics / researchers / scientists who are anti GMO. why are these people not jumping onto all his "research"?
try:
https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2011/02/p ... VM-Ezd6u9J
https://www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/Glyphosate4-11.htm
for a hint.
that Dr Huber apparently refuses to release any of his "work" / "studies" for peer review
smells very much like a very large bit of quackerooism.
not sure if you have any kind of technical background, but let me ask you this:
how many horsepower does a bushel of corn contain? that's the ERG thing....
make sense to you? it's not a conventional measure of anything food related.
which is the "in your face" insanity of many "points" made the cited article
quote: 'The important thing to note in these deficiencies is that these are exactly the deficiencies in a human being that lead to susceptibility to sickness, disorders and cancer."
this guy needs to go work for NIH - since he knows the reasons for all these diseases - he seems to know everything about everything medical - science has been looking for these answers for a long time.
quote: "people who have cancer are low in maganese (sic)."
and people with aluminum in the brain die from Alzheimer.
a 1950's UK "Doctor" got that started, it's been disproven by all the research since, but it's still "true"
sheer quackery / scare tactics
quote: " because Glyphosate draws out the vital nutrients of living things."
can you understand what that means? sounds like 1000% gobblygook to me.
don't get me wrong - I'm not fond of the GMO trend - I think there's a lot we don't know about it. but this kind of 'science' / information does more harm than good in the effort to get the discussions taken seriously.
many farmers are anti-GMO. one of the reasons is the cost of the seed, plus the seed cannot be 'saved' - that's illegal. plus many farmers have had their crops contaminated by GMO strains then been sued for having GMO crops. (don't ask, doesn't make sense to me either - you plant a non-GMO corn field, it gets contaminated by somebody else's GMO cornfield, you get held legally liable because you now have GMO corn in the non-GMO field you planted . . . only in America.....)
